Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:13 -0300, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote:
>> On Wednesday 26 March 2008 03:21:11 Li Zefan wrote:
>>>> I would prefer sleeping between the events rather than removing 9th
>>>> testcase ;-) What do you all think ??
>>> I prefer this too in that it won't break the test purpose. If no one has an
>>> objection on it, a patch will come up soon. :)
>> Np, only a sleep is enough :-)
>
> Li,
>
> Shoot across your Patch.
>
I'm working on this, and I found out a sleep won't work, because a single
read() is called after all events has been triggered, and at that time
the 2 IN_MOVE_SELF events has been coalesced into a single one.
There was a bug in inotify, which has been fixed recently. This bug is the
reason why the event coalescence didn't work before.
I would like to add the test for the event coalescence.
A patch will come up soon, please be patient. ;)
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --
>> Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
