On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 14:51 +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > Subrata Modak wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:13 -0300, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote: > >> On Wednesday 26 March 2008 03:21:11 Li Zefan wrote: > >>>> I would prefer sleeping between the events rather than removing 9th > >>>> testcase ;-) What do you all think ?? > >>> I prefer this too in that it won't break the test purpose. If no one has > >>> an > >>> objection on it, a patch will come up soon. :) > >> Np, only a sleep is enough :-) > > > > Li, > > > > Shoot across your Patch. > > > > I'm working on this, and I found out a sleep won't work, because a single > read() is called after all events has been triggered, and at that time > the 2 IN_MOVE_SELF events has been coalesced into a single one. > > There was a bug in inotify, which has been fixed recently. This bug is the > reason why the event coalescence didn't work before. > > I would like to add the test for the event coalescence.
Good. > > A patch will come up soon, please be patient. ;) I am. Regards-- Subrata > > > Regards-- > > Subrata > > > >> Cheers, > >> > >> -- > >> Ricardo Salveti de Araujo > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
