Hello,
     It's me emailing again about attempting to improve the way that LTP is
built and tested.
     As part of the validation of work with Cisco that I'm working on, it is
my responsibility to integrate LTP into our testing infrastructure. After
analyzing the Makefiles I've come to the following conclusions:

   1. The make process isn't multiple arch/target friendly, i.e. you
   build once for x86 and you have to rebuild for ia64, ppc64, etc and after
   the build capture all of the compiled binaries using some intermediary
   method.
   2. Assuming that the user has gmake (which they should if they plan on
   working with LTP and Linux), there are a number of simplifications that can
   be made to the Makefiles to allow for simpler variable and make target
   definition.
   3. The uclinux* make targets could be removed in favor of
   conditionally defined global targets.

     I am more than happy to complete all of the work and submit it to LTP,
but I need to know whether or not there is any interest from the LTP
community before going down that road too far.
Thanks,
-Garrett

PS I have no intention of using automake / autoconf. I find them to be
somewhat atrocious build utilities :)...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to