On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > 1. The make process isn't multiple arch/target friendly, i.e. you > > > build once for x86 and you have to rebuiI am not sure about uclinux* > > targetsld for ia64, ppc64, etc and > > after the build capture all of the compiled binaries using some > > intermediary method. > > multi-arch itself by definition is limiting. adding any sort of magic in > this > direction is just bloat. i'd focus on out-of-tree building as that would > address any sort of random stuff people want to do. >
I agree with you Mike, but I am curious to see what Garrett has, specially if those cleanups are generic > > 2. Assuming that the user has gmake (which they should if they plan on > > > working with LTP and Linux), there are a number of simplifications that > > can be made to the Makefiles to allow for simpler variable and make target > > definition. > > the gmake requirement has been unwritten so far ... might as well codify the > requirement and stop dancing around the issue. > The question basically boils down to -- can we use GNU make specific features? My answer would be "Yes" > > 3. The uclinux* make targets could be removed in favor of > > conditionally defined global targets. > > this is just a silly target. i'd punt it. > -mike Balbir ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
