May be Mike/Carmelo can handle this. Regards-- Subrata
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 11:59 +0800, Alvin wrote: > And the ltp version is 20080331. > When I use 20080430, its log is: > > $ ./simpletest.sh > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > testsetup() failed: Operation not permitted > > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I run fs_perms tests on an ARM board 2.6.24, and its log is: > > $ ./simpletest.sh > x a 001 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(12/100) FAIL > x a 010 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(200/99) PASS > x a 100 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) FAIL > w a 002 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(12/100) FAIL > w a 020 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(200/99) FAIL > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) FAIL > r a 004 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(12/100) FAIL > r a 040 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(200/99) PASS > r a 400 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) FAIL > r a 000 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/99) PASS > w a 000 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/99) PASS > x a 000 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/99) PASS > x a 010 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) FAIL > x a 100 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(200/99) PASS > w a 020 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) PASS > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(200/99) PASS > r a 040 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) FAIL > r a 400 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(200/99) PASS > > There are some FAIL, is it normal? But I think it should be > all PASS. > Are there some configuation I did not set up? such as user and > groups, Do I need to add 200, 500 groups? There are already > 99(nobody) user and group. And IDcheck.sh passed. > > Thank you! > -- > Best Wishes, > Alvin > > > > -- > Best Wishes, > Alvin > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
