On Tuesday 06 May 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 05 May 2008, Alvin wrote: > > x a 000 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/99) PASS > > x a 010 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) FAIL > > x a 100 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(200/99) PASS > > the current ltp code says these should all be doable, but i think > simpletest.sh is incorrect. none of these permission/ownership > combinations should allow execution (and that's the behavior i see in > Linux). the old test code would always return 0 instead of actually > testing to see if the exec() worked.
nm ... the inverted meaning of standard true/false and 0/1 confused me. i changed the code to follow the normal meaning (zero means success and all non-zero means failure). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
