On Monday 05 May 2008, Alvin wrote: > x a 000 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/99) PASS > x a 010 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) FAIL > x a 100 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(200/99) PASS
the current ltp code says these should all be doable, but i think simpletest.sh is incorrect. none of these permission/ownership combinations should allow execution (and that's the behavior i see in Linux). the old test code would always return 0 instead of actually testing to see if the exec() worked. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
