On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 10:27 +0800, Roy Lee wrote: > 2008/5/19, Helge Deller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Roy, > > > > > > > > > How about merge the scenario of shm06 into shm04, and then eliminate > > shm06? > > > > > > Modify shm04 to attach the same segment _twice_ to the child's address > > space. > > > In this case, the first returned address should be the same as where the > > parent attaches its segment to while the second returned address should be > > different. > > > > > > > Yes, this is probably the best idea. > > Alternatively, just leave shm04 as-is, and do the twice-mapping you > > mentioned above in shm06. This way we'd keep two simple tests. > > > > Helge > > > > Hi guys, > > Here's the patch for the shmt06 according to Helge's recommandation, > please help review it. > Thanks.
Roy, This is applied too along with Helge´s patch on shmt05.c. When you send me the next patch, send it across the latest CVS. Regards-- Subrata > > Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
