Subrata Modak wrote: > On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 10:27 +0800, Roy Lee wrote: >> 2008/5/19, Helge Deller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Hi Roy, >>> >>>> How about merge the scenario of shm06 into shm04, and then eliminate >>> shm06? >>>> Modify shm04 to attach the same segment _twice_ to the child's address >>> space. >>>> In this case, the first returned address should be the same as where the >>> parent attaches its segment to while the second returned address should be >>> different. >>> Yes, this is probably the best idea. >>> Alternatively, just leave shm04 as-is, and do the twice-mapping you >>> mentioned above in shm06. This way we'd keep two simple tests. >>> >>> Helge >>> >> Hi guys, >> >> Here's the patch for the shmt06 according to Helge's recommandation, >> please help review it. >> Thanks. > > Roy, > > This is applied too along with Helge´s patch on shmt05.c. When you send > me the next patch, send it across the latest CVS.
Thanks Roy and Subrata, I've tested both patches (yours and mine) now on parisc, and they succeeded as intended. Helge ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
