Hi Paul/James, On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 20:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > On Tuesday 26 August 2008 7:18:22 pm James Morris wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > Hi James, > > > > > > As i have talked to the SE-Linux mini summit during OLS 2008, > > > regarding testing all components of LSM, i would like to know if > > > you would like to share testing the AUDIT LSM in kernel. If > > > possible i would like to get them integrated inside LTP under > > > GPLv2. Let me know what you think about this. > > > > Sounds like a good idea. Who is going to do what? > > I agree, testing is always good. That said I'm not sure how much I will > be able to help in the near future. We here at HP did release some > audit tests from our recent Common Criteria certifications on > SourceForge[1] which may or may-not be helpful. The don't utilize the > LTP framework but they may provide some test development ideas.
It is perfectly Ok, if some tests do not obey the LTP framework, but they still exist inside LTP. You can see that for yourself here: http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/, While testcases like open_posix, open_hpi, kdump, ballista, pounder21, realtime, etc do not follow LTP framework. Hence during LTP releases, these are also released as separate tarballs apart from being part of the main release tarball as well. So, people who use all the tests will download the main release, others do selective downloads. What you see inside the http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/, sub directory are the actual test cases which follow the LTP framework. In fact if there are tests which just return 0/non-zero on PASS/FAIL is a suitable candidate for initial inclusion into absolute LTP framework. Even during the last FOSS 2007 meeting, i had a talk with James and he said that HP has released Common Criteria certifications. I was wondering that i had done only for IBM´s and SGI´s Common Criteria Certification testsuite release, not for HP: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3382, So, wouldn´t it be better to put audit-test somewhere here: http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/, or, more better here: http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/, If you give me a thumbsup for this, initially i would request a DCO signoff mail (my legal obligations) from you to ltp-list. Nexttime onwards, whenever you update your releases in https://sourceforge.net/projects/audit-test, i can automatically pull the diff inside LTP. Do you think that this can be a nice beginning ? Regards-- Subrata > > [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/audit-test > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
