Hi Paul,

On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:04 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2008 9:44:35 am Subrata Modak wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 20:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 26 August 2008 7:18:22 pm James Morris wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > > > Hi James,
> > > > >
> > > > > As i have talked to the SE-Linux mini summit during OLS 2008,
> > > > > regarding testing all components of LSM, i would like to know
> > > > > if you would like to share testing the AUDIT LSM in kernel. If
> > > > > possible i would like to get them integrated inside LTP under
> > > > > GPLv2. Let me know what you think about this.
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like a good idea.  Who is going to do what?
> > >
> > > I agree, testing is always good.  That said I'm not sure how much I
> > > will be able to help in the near future.  We here at HP did release
> > > some audit tests from our recent Common Criteria certifications on
> > > SourceForge[1] which may or may-not be helpful.  The don't utilize
> > > the LTP framework but they may provide some test development ideas.
> >
> > It is perfectly Ok, if some tests do not obey the LTP framework, but
> > they still exist inside LTP. You can see that for yourself here:
> >
> > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/,
> >
> > While testcases like open_posix, open_hpi, kdump, ballista,
> > pounder21, realtime, etc do not follow LTP framework. Hence during
> > LTP releases, these are also released as separate tarballs apart from
> > being part of the main release tarball as well. So, people who use
> > all the tests will download the main release, others do selective
> > downloads.
> >
> > What you see inside the
> > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/, sub
> > directory are the actual test cases which follow the LTP framework.
> > In fact if there are tests which just return 0/non-zero on PASS/FAIL
> > is a suitable candidate for initial inclusion into absolute LTP
> > framework.
> 
> Hi Subrata,
> 
> Yes, we've used the LTP testsuite in the past and I want to thank you 
> and everyone in the LTP community for their work in producing such a 
> through test suite.

Thanks. The credit for this should go to the early maintainers like
Robert Williamson, Paul Larson, Martin Ridgeway, Micheal Reed, Nathan
Stratz, Manoj Iyer, and others who did a tremendous work during that
time. I have just taken over from them newly.

> 
> > Even during the last FOSS 2007 meeting, i had a talk with James and
> > he said that HP has released Common Criteria certifications. I was
> > wondering that i had done only for IBM´s and SGI´s Common Criteria
> > Certification testsuite release, not for HP:
> >
> > https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3382,
> >
> > So, wouldn´t it be better to put audit-test somewhere here:
> > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/,
> >
> > or, more better here:
> > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/,
> >
> > If you give me a thumbsup for this, initially i would request a DCO
> > signoff mail (my legal obligations) from you to ltp-list. Nexttime
> > onwards, whenever you update your releases in
> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/audit-test, i can automatically pull
> > the diff inside LTP. Do you think that this can be a nice beginning ?
> 
> At this point in time we are not interested in moving the audit-test 
> sources to the LTP project; however, we would support posting 
> audit-test releases along with the other Common Criteria test suites.  
> This should be possible without any paperwork since the audit-test 
> project is GPLv2 licensed.  If that is not sufficient please send me 
> whatever paperwork/signoff/email is necessary and I will take a look at 
> it and get back to you.

Sure, you can always do that. No paper work in required. If you are
doing it through e-mail, then just signoff that mail to ltp-list. Else
you can also post things to Sf.net tracker like this:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1942286&group_id=3382&atid=303382,

Thanks for initiating this co-operation. We can explore other things in
future as well.

Regards--
Subrata

> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to