On Friday 29 August 2008 6:00:46 am Subrata Modak wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:04 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Thursday 28 August 2008 9:44:35 am Subrata Modak wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 20:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 26 August 2008 7:18:22 pm James Morris wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > > > > Hi James, > > > > > > > > > > > > As i have talked to the SE-Linux mini summit during OLS > > > > > > 2008, regarding testing all components of LSM, i would like > > > > > > to know if you would like to share testing the AUDIT LSM in > > > > > > kernel. If possible i would like to get them integrated > > > > > > inside LTP under GPLv2. Let me know what you think about > > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > Sounds like a good idea. Who is going to do what? > > > > > > > > I agree, testing is always good. That said I'm not sure how > > > > much I will be able to help in the near future. We here at HP > > > > did release some audit tests from our recent Common Criteria > > > > certifications on SourceForge[1] which may or may-not be > > > > helpful. The don't utilize the LTP framework but they may > > > > provide some test development ideas. > > > > > > It is perfectly Ok, if some tests do not obey the LTP framework, > > > but they still exist inside LTP. You can see that for yourself > > > here: > > > > > > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/, > > > > > > While testcases like open_posix, open_hpi, kdump, ballista, > > > pounder21, realtime, etc do not follow LTP framework. Hence > > > during LTP releases, these are also released as separate tarballs > > > apart from being part of the main release tarball as well. So, > > > people who use all the tests will download the main release, > > > others do selective downloads. > > > > > > What you see inside the > > > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/, sub > > > directory are the actual test cases which follow the LTP > > > framework. In fact if there are tests which just return > > > 0/non-zero on PASS/FAIL is a suitable candidate for initial > > > inclusion into absolute LTP framework. > > > > Hi Subrata, > > > > Yes, we've used the LTP testsuite in the past and I want to thank > > you and everyone in the LTP community for their work in producing > > such a through test suite. > > Thanks. The credit for this should go to the early maintainers like > Robert Williamson, Paul Larson, Martin Ridgeway, Micheal Reed, Nathan > Stratz, Manoj Iyer, and others who did a tremendous work during that > time. I have just taken over from them newly. > > > > Even during the last FOSS 2007 meeting, i had a talk with James > > > and he said that HP has released Common Criteria certifications. > > > I was wondering that i had done only for IBM´s and SGI´s Common > > > Criteria Certification testsuite release, not for HP: > > > > > > https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3382, > > > > > > So, wouldn´t it be better to put audit-test somewhere here: > > > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/, > > > > > > or, more better here: > > > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/ > > >, > > > > > > If you give me a thumbsup for this, initially i would request a > > > DCO signoff mail (my legal obligations) from you to ltp-list. > > > Nexttime onwards, whenever you update your releases in > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/audit-test, i can automatically > > > pull the diff inside LTP. Do you think that this can be a nice > > > beginning ? > > > > At this point in time we are not interested in moving the > > audit-test sources to the LTP project; however, we would support > > posting audit-test releases along with the other Common Criteria > > test suites. This should be possible without any paperwork since > > the audit-test project is GPLv2 licensed. If that is not > > sufficient please send me whatever paperwork/signoff/email is > > necessary and I will take a look at it and get back to you. > > Sure, you can always do that. No paper work in required. If you are > doing it through e-mail, then just signoff that mail to ltp-list. > Else you can also post things to Sf.net tracker like this: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1942286&gro >up_id=3382&atid=303382, > > Thanks for initiating this co-operation. We can explore other things > in future as well.
Excellent, thank you. The latest release of the audit-test project can be downloaded at the link below. * http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=167060 Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- paul moore linux @ hp ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
