On Mar 1, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 01 March 2009 19:54:20 Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Mar 1, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Sunday 01 March 2009 16:24:28 Németh Márton wrote:
>>>> +#if 0
>>>
>>> what's with all this "#if 0" junk ? delete that cruft please.
>>
>> Apart from that, does this cause regressions with earlier kernels? I
>> don't see version specific API checks...
>
> i dont think we want to get into the business of supporting a wide
> range of
> kernels. every other project that has tried has ended up with an
> ifdef mess.
> -mike
Then why are we worried about 2.4 regressions like we have been
in the past? And what happens to all of the folks with kernel versions
prior to this change? This test will break.
This can turn into less of an ifdef mess by properly making these
calls into either macros, or version specific translation function
calls in C.
Don't you love all of the POLA changes in Penguin-land :(?
My 2 cents,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
