On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Mike Frysinger<[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday 02 July 2009 21:21:06 Garrett Cooper wrote: >> Both sinclude and include are possible I suppose, but as far as I >> understand that actually does an fstat, tries to open the file, etc, >> but this completely ignores the include statement and reduces I/O a bit. > > yes, it'll remove a syscall or two, but i dont think that is significant in > the larger scheme of things > > the problem is that i dont want these kind of ifdef things propagating as > they'll get tweaked and go inconsistent all over the place > > how about include a top level .mk file that always exists and in there, you > have the conditional config.mk include > -mike
I couldn't agree more :)... FWIW using include all over the place has footprint implications (somewhere on the order of 2~3 times longer when taxing the fs a bit more), so it could be a boon to multijob compiles to go with sinclude / -include. People already complain about compiling LTP in my group -- I'm just trying to give them less of a reason to complain :).. Thanks, -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
