On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 13:32 -0700, Matt Helsley wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:35:46PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday 02 July 2009 05:05:32 Matt Helsley wrote: > > > As best I can tell these tests do not use true sh syntax -- they use bash > > > syntax. Rather than bother hunting down all the bash-isms just convert > > > them to use bash as their interpretter. > > > > the changelog doesnt seem to jive with the commit. if you were merely > > changing the shebang, why did you also fix the bashisms like s/==/-eq/ ? > > Good point -- it does make the == -> -eq and the || -> -o conversions > pointless. > > > > > at any rate, someone (i dont recall who) posted fixes to these files > > recently > > to de-bashify them. there was some feedback though, so perhaps you should > > address those minor issues and submit an updated patch. > > OK, I'll look for that patch and consider it as a replacement for 3 and 4 of > this series.
Will wait for this from you. Regards-- Subrata > > > > > in general, converting sh to bash is a bad idea as it can cause issues for > > us > > embedded peeps. > > -mike > > I suppose that's because of the memory bash consumes. Is there anything else > it does which is bad for embedded? > > Cheers, > -Matt Helsley ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
