On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Matt Helsley<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:09:16PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Thursday 02 July 2009 16:32:53 Matt Helsley wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:35:46PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > > in general, converting sh to bash is a bad idea as it can cause issues
>> > > for us embedded peeps.
>> >
>> > I suppose that's because of the memory bash consumes. Is there anything
>> > else it does which is bad for embedded?
>>
>> there is memory and disk usage concerns, but there are also systems that cant
>> run bash at all (e.g. systems without fork() -- all no-mmu Linux ports)
>> -mike
>
> Here's that updated patch which hopefully should be able to replace 3
> and 4 of my recent series. Unfortunately I haven't had a chance to test it so
> I'm posting it in case someone else does. As the original author of the
> patch Jiri is welcome to add his signoff as well.
>
> From: Jiri Palecek <[email protected]>
>
> This patch removes a bunch of bashisms.
>
> It was originally written by Jiri Palecek but lacked changes
> requested by Mike Frysinger.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
Hi Matt,
Please see the comments I just made to his first diff submitted
back in May 25th. Many of the comments I made there apply to this
change as well.
Thanks,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list