Hi! > Some days before, mitani-san reported some sigaction test failed at linux, > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=000001cb798d%241aaa0210%244ffe0630%24%40co.jp > > As Garrett said, add Linux-isms is not advisably. So i want try to fix it by > another method. > > I have seen the assertions.xml, these tests want to test sigaction with > SA_RESTART > not sem_wait(it looks like there's a bug at older linux kernel), so i suggest > to > instead sem_wait by fcntl. > > What about this one? If you agree with me, i will post other patchs.
As far as I understand this, you are trying to avoid a fact, that older kernels are not comforming to the POSIX specification. This is a case where the test is failing for a good reason, all we could do here is print message like: "this test is known to fail on linux kernel < 2.6.22" Before the test reports failure. On the other end I do not object to adding test for file locks with SA_RESTART. But you should not remove the sem_lock() test (as it's not broken). -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
