Hi! > >>> Some days before, mitani-san reported some sigaction test failed at linux, > >>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=000001cb798d%241aaa0210%244ffe0630%24%40co.jp > >>> > >>> As Garrett said, add Linux-isms is not advisably. So i want try to fix it > >>> by another method. > >>> > >>> I have seen the assertions.xml, these tests want to test sigaction with > >>> SA_RESTART > >>> not sem_wait(it looks like there's a bug at older linux kernel), so i > >>> suggest to > >>> instead sem_wait by fcntl. > >>> > >>> What about this one? If you agree with me, i will post other patchs. > >> As far as I understand this, you are trying to avoid a fact, that older > >> kernels are not comforming to the POSIX specification. This is a case > >> where the test is failing for a good reason, all we could do here is > >> print message like: > >> > >> "this test is known to fail on linux kernel < 2.6.22" > >> > >> Before the test reports failure. > > > > Well... I would actually record these items in a file somewhere. Once > > upon a time the ltp-results@ list was a good source for this data, but > > I don't know how useful this data is anymore or how much/well this > > data is reported and subsequently mined (I'm not on the list for > > instance)... > > > >> On the other end I do not object to adding test for file locks with > >> SA_RESTART. But you should not remove the sem_lock() test (as it's not > >> broken). > > > > Agreed. > > > > Well... > Then, do you have a plan to do it?
So far there are more important things on my TODO. -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
