Hi! > >> Add IPC syscalls test-cases from "runtest/syscalls" file also to > >> "runtest/ipc" for people interested in running IPC tests only. > >> > >> Run via './runltp -f ipc'. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek<[email protected]> > >> --- > >> runtest/ipc | 60 > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) > > > > > > NAK. Duplication is generally a bad idea. > > This have the side effect of running the same tests twice for people that > > run ipc and syscalls test scenarios. > > > > The background of this was an issue in Linux-Next. > The ipc test-cases were fine, but syscalls test-cases revealed that > sth. was wrong in that Linux-Next release. > For me it was not clear to also test the syscalls. > > So, what is with the idea of a "runtest/syscalls-ipc" file (my > original "v1" patch, this here is "v2")?
I think that we can go with the v1 for now and figure out something better for the new test execution framework. Are you OK with that? -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
