On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:24 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! >> >> Add IPC syscalls test-cases from "runtest/syscalls" file also to >> >> "runtest/ipc" for people interested in running IPC tests only. >> >> >> >> Run via './runltp -f ipc'. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek<[email protected]> >> >> --- >> >> runtest/ipc | 60 >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) >> > >> > >> > NAK. Duplication is generally a bad idea. >> > This have the side effect of running the same tests twice for people that >> > run ipc and syscalls test scenarios. >> > >> >> The background of this was an issue in Linux-Next. >> The ipc test-cases were fine, but syscalls test-cases revealed that >> sth. was wrong in that Linux-Next release. >> For me it was not clear to also test the syscalls. >> >> So, what is with the idea of a "runtest/syscalls-ipc" file (my >> original "v1" patch, this here is "v2")? > > I think that we can go with the v1 for now and figure out something > better for the new test execution framework. Are you OK with that? >
Yay! ipc and syscalls-ipc test-cases helped here a lot to test Linux-Next IPC code. - Sedat - > -- > Cyril Hrubis > [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
