Hi! > >>> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek<[email protected]> > >>> --- > >>> runtest/ipc | 60 > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) > >> NAK. Duplication is generally a bad idea. > >> This have the side effect of running the same tests twice for people > >> that run ipc and syscalls test scenarios. > > Hmm, this is a valid point. > > > > Thinking of the ideal way, it may be more data driven framework with a > > list of all tests anotated with some group labels. I noted this for the > > planned testdriver rewrite. > > > > We can easily support this with existing infrastructure if we add some > structure to the test case tags. > For instance on runtest/syscalls, one could use: > msgctl01_ipc > msgctl02_ipc > ... > > Then when calling runltp, one can use -s option to filter tests cases, > e.g. ./runltp -f syscalls -s '*_ipc' > > At Texas Instruments we use following convention for TAG names > <AREA>_<SCOPE>_<TYPE>_<ID> > >
That is no go, at least here we have database of testruns for different distributions and renaming the testcases tags will break the regression detection. So I would preffer solution that adds a metadata without renaming the current test tags. The problem is that ltp-pan and runltp are so horribly outdated and unmaintaned that adding functionality to these is out of question. -- Cyril Hrubis [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
