On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Petr Machata <pmachata at redhat.com> wrote: > It seems like I wanted to redo what PowerPC (and newly Xtensa!) was/is > doing with unresolving PLT slots when they are resolved, so that we > don't have to move breakpoints to function entry points, but can keep > them in PLT. I'm not sure how far I got. The code for this > specifically seems to be in, but it is likely that I broke some other > MIPS use cases, special symbol types or other MIPS magic. > > Someone would need to fix regressions in test cases between > pmachata/mips and 94773bf0b1 (the branch-off point) and fix them. They > would need to have enough domain knowledge to realize where the test > suite has blind spots, what it doesn't test, and add tests and fixes for > these test cases. That someone is unlikely to be me, my personal time > budget is actually even more strained now than it was a year ago.
Just started looking at your branch before the holidays. The 'unresolve' logic for pre-linked ELFs is missing and some of the calculations need to be biased appropriately. I don't have the necessary domain knowledge, but I do have time, so if someone could nudge me in the right direction ... Running regressions now, I have a couple of questions coming your way. Regards, Faraz Shahbazker _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
