This mouse is chewing on the problem already.
Don't know if it will have a solution by midnight though  ;-)


On Wednesday 06 March 2002 01:18, you wrote:
> I played with that a little bit but I spend so damn much time
> fixing Microsoft messes that I can't play with this
>
> I feel like Cinderella so busy fixing that evil step sisters
> stuff I don't have time to make my dress (maybe the mice are
> doing it for me)
>
> Matt
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wouter DeBacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:39 PM
> > To: Egan, Matt B. (Artco)
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] k12os [was Re: hardware demands
> > for Server whe n having 160 client computers?]
> >
> > Matt,
> >
> > Good thinking! I back that up. I am doing the same at my
> > school.
> >
> > Given that IceWM doesn't show a menu entry if the user
> > hasn't got enough rights to the associated application,  I
> > am _experimenting_ with a specific GID for every app I let
> > them use, ie. LTopera for Opera, LTacro for Acrobat Reader,
> > etc.
> >
> > I then chown the app to its specific group and give no
> > rights at all to members of other groups. When a user needs
> > to be able to use an application I make him/her a member of
> > the specific group and automagically (s)he gets to see the
> > menu item.
> >
> > The overall advantage of this twisted procedure is that I
> > still have one centralized set of config files for IceWM,
> > instead of slightly modified versions floating around the
> > server's HD for each user with personal requests..
> >
> > But please remember that all of this is still in an
> > experimental pre-alpha stage. No warranty whatsoever ...  
> > ;-)
> >
> > Wouter
> >
> > On Tuesday 05 March 2002 23:38, you wrote:
> > > Keep people away from xterm or any terminal type login
> > > (that's how I do it)
> > >
> > > I give them nothing but icewm and it only has shortcuts to
> > > the apps that they need to use if they need more they call
> > > me and I give them more.
> > >
> > > I know that obscurity isn't security but it is a good
> > > start.
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Hans Ekbrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:21 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] k12os [was Re: hardware demands
> > > > for Server when having 160 client computers?]
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 03:18:33PM -0500, Julius
> >
> > Szelagiewicz wrote:
> > [wdb: snip...]
> >
> > > > Since I might go and offer LTSP to some schools around
> > > > here, I find your information most valuable Julius. I
> > > > had a glance at k12linux web site, but I did find it
> > > > lacking in the security area. I remember that security
> > > > problem often plagued the administrators at your high
> > > > school, and many of us students used most of the time
> > > > hacking/cracking in those labs (not me though).
> > > >
> > > > Limiting users cpu load is one problem. Another one is
> > > > if one user do disk-access-intensive things like:
> > > >
> > > > grep -r foo /
> > > >
> > > > How do people on this list handle security problems like
> > > > these with ltsp in, say high-schools?
> > > >
> > > > Hans Ekbrand

_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net

Reply via email to