I see the confusion.  You are looking at the wrong wiki page.

Take a look here:

    http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/DownLoads

Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Jari Turkia wrote:
> Scott Balneaves wrote:
>> You don't have to have ubuntu: we provide tarballs up on the website
>> that have an LTSP 5 chroot.  Download and install on any distro.
>>   
> So you're saying "Download and install on any distro." here: 
> http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/IntegratingLtsp
> I'll definitely be the first to say that I really did not understand 
> everything there. If possible, point me to the part of the page where it 
> says so, or to the correct document.
> 
>>> I¨m not calling a mutiny here.
>>>     
>> Sure you are. :)
>>   
> No, I'm not.
> Unlike you, I don't find this funny. I really really would like to 
> continue having all stuff working here. It includes LTSP.
> 
>> 2) Advocate with your distro: "Hey, Debian, Ubuntu, and Fedora are
>> working on/have implemented LTSP5 in the distro!! Why aren't we,
>> especially when the LTSP developers have said thay're HAPPY to work with
>> distro people to get it integrated!"
>>   
> Phew, I already feel much better. :-)
> It so happens, that I already did: 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234048
> Also it is nice to notice that somebody else already did something about 
> it: http://en.opensuse.org/LTSP
> 
> However, no matter what  you say, all the old things and ways of doing 
> cannot cease in an instant. With that being said, I know that project 
> resources are limited. Definitely one day all major distros will support 
> LTSP, no doubt about that. Unfortunately we're not yet there and 
> therefore we need to advocate having old things working for a while.
> 
> Also, I'd have a question (ok, in fact there are two) for you: I'm 
> running x86_64 architecture linux on the server. My clients are of 
> various ages (oldest one is a P II 350 MHz, runs LTSP /w X great!). What 
> are my chances of success with LTSP 5? What you're saying that in this 
> ah-so-much-better-way-of-doing-things I need to have a different set of 
> packages (of different architecture) in a separate directory for 
> LTSP-distro and when everything is properly supported all runs like a 
> charm and both installations can be kept up to date. Did I get that correct?
> 
> Regards,
> Jari Turkia
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to