Hi, likely()/unlikely() seems to be amongst the last macros that urcu defines that don't have urcu-specific prefixes. Thoughts on whether we should add a prefix such as caa_likely() and caa_unlikely() are welcome.
Thanks, Mathieu * Rafael Fernandez ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi Matthieu, > > I am trying to incorporate liburcu in a project I am working with. > Unfourtunately there are several collisions of the definitions of > likely and unlikely. Would it be possible for you to add a prefix to > the macros such that there aren't any collisions? I think it would be > cleaner/easier for future users to incorporate into existing code > bases. > > Thank you, > Rafael > > -- > Rafael E. Fernández > B.S. Computer Science > University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
