* Stephen Hemminger ([email protected]) wrote: > > > likely()/unlikely() seems to be amongst the last macros that urcu > > defines that don't have urcu-specific prefixes. Thoughts on whether > > we > > should add a prefix such as caa_likely() and caa_unlikely() are > > welcome. > > In our usage of liburcu, I had to do macro whacking to workaround > this conflict. Even wrapping the definition in urcu with '#ifndef likely' > would help.
OK. I'll rename likely/unlikely to caa_likely/caa_unlikely. commit a0b7f7ea3fc3339a1c42caffd53ce9f056e5b901 Author: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> Date: Tue Nov 1 19:58:52 2011 -0400 Rename likely/unlikely to caa_likely/caa_unlikely This fixes namespace conflicts. Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> Thanks for your feedback! Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
