> likely()/unlikely() seems to be amongst the last macros that urcu > defines that don't have urcu-specific prefixes. Thoughts on whether > we > should add a prefix such as caa_likely() and caa_unlikely() are > welcome.
In our usage of liburcu, I had to do macro whacking to workaround this conflict. Even wrapping the definition in urcu with '#ifndef likely' would help. _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
