Hisham, Fabio, On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 00:43, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bug: I can name a rock foo.bar and it will work. But I can't put it as > a dependency (dot in name is rejected). > If dots in names are rejected, they should be rejected early. > P.S. I would like to use a dot in my rock name to denote that a rock > is a part of group of rocks package. > Otherwise I'll have three dashes in rock name which is not good. > Will anything break if we'd allow dots in rock names? > Or am I missing something? Sorry to nag, but please comment on this. Is dot in rock names allowed or is it not? If it is allowed, then I'll try to fix dependency parser. Alexander. _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
