On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks like there's a number of little changes that have been suggested > lately that could eventually become a new version of the rockspec > format, for a new major release.
Yes, I notice that rockspec_version is an optional field, currently "1.0". LR will even tell you to upgrade if this is explicitly set to some other value. Which brings us to another interesting possibility: delivering LR upgrades via LR itself. At the very least, configure should try to detect an existing installation (assumed to be working?) For LR post 2.x, then 'luarocks install luarocks' is completely possible, if done with care. Anybody interested in such an experiment? There would be a luarocks-2.0.3 and a luarocks-scm rockspec available for eager beavers. steve d. PS. reading code is often a source of pleasant suprises. For instance, the source.url field can point directly to a .lua or .c files and things just work. _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
