On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Fabio Mascarenhas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:12 AM, steve donovan >> >> At this point, however, LR2 is hardcoded to Unix-centric deploy >> subdirs (e.g. share/lua/5.1) while LfW, I believe, is using something >> different. We could try to harmonize this in a future version so that >> LfW shipped its modules as a "pre-populated LR tree". Unless you >> really don't want to mix LR-installed and LfW-installed modules, of >> course. > > LR2 does not have hardcoded deploy subdirs, that is one of the things > that I changed to get it to play nice with LfW. Check the commits, and > the LfW-ready zips. :-)
Indeed, I thought it was so, but I glanced quickly at the code and was misled by the dir.path(repo.root, "share", "lua", "5.1") -- I missed the "repo.lua_dir or " in front of it. :) -- Hisham _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
