On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Alexander Gladysh <aglad...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Hisham <h...@hisham.hm> wrote: >> Users already complained about this behavior: >> https://github.com/keplerproject/luarocks/pull/89 > > Any updates on this? We'd like to contribute a solution to LuaRocks, > but these discussions take too long to reach a conclusion. Should we > settle for a private patch, useless for community?
I've been working on this, but as I dug into it I realized proper support for multiple trees has to be made explicit to all local tree operations. When I implemented --nodeps I had done it in a hackish way and now the feature was somewhat overlapping with multitree support (--nodeps is essentially an empty tree list) so I decided to clean it up. I just pushed a branch so you can check out the work in progress: https://github.com/keplerproject/luarocks/tree/multitree -- Hisham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
