On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Hisham <h...@hisham.hm> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Alexander Gladysh <aglad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Hisham <h...@hisham.hm> wrote: >>> Users already complained about this behavior: >>> https://github.com/keplerproject/luarocks/pull/89 >> >> Any updates on this? We'd like to contribute a solution to LuaRocks, >> but these discussions take too long to reach a conclusion. Should we >> settle for a private patch, useless for community?
(BTW, sorry if it sounded harsh.) > I've been working on this, but as I dug into it I realized proper Cool! > support for multiple trees has to be made explicit to all local tree > operations. When I implemented --nodeps I had done it in a hackish way > and now the feature was somewhat overlapping with multitree support > (--nodeps is essentially an empty tree list) so I decided to clean it > up. Please tell me if we can help with getting this feature implemented one way or another. > I just pushed a branch so you can check out the work in progress: > > https://github.com/keplerproject/luarocks/tree/multitree Will do. Alexander ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
