On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Hisham <h...@hisham.hm> wrote:
> I don't know either. Perhaps LuaRocks should use a different binary
> suffix identifier? Still, "linux-x86" is no guarantee of ABI
> compatibility, either.
>
> Exactly! My feeling is that the old MSVC 2005 runtime should be put out of
its misery. When LfW is end-of-lifed and new version based on LuaDist
batteries (+ LuaRocks) arrives, then there should be no confusion. It
remains important for LR to recognize then that this platform binary is
only appropriate for a mingw environment - people with MSVC will build
their own.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and
their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed
leaders in the field. The early access version is available now.
Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
