On 13 May, 2013, at 10:02 , steve donovan <steve.j.dono...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Hisham <h...@hisham.hm> wrote: > I don't know either. Perhaps LuaRocks should use a different binary > suffix identifier? Still, "linux-x86" is no guarantee of ABI > compatibility, either. > > Exactly! My feeling is that the old MSVC 2005 runtime should be put out of > its misery. When LfW is end-of-lifed and new version based on LuaDist > batteries (+ LuaRocks) arrives, then there should be no confusion. It > remains important for LR to recognize then that this platform binary is only > appropriate for a mingw environment - people with MSVC will build their own. I am currently battling the same issue while trying to merge things together. I am using the following notations on Windows: Windows-x86 = MinGW32 (official) Windows-x86_64 = MinGW64 (TDM recommended) Windows-msvc = Visual Studio (Visual Studio Express 11, free to download), this is 64bit only pd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
