> -----Original Message----- > From: Justin Cormack [mailto:jus...@specialbusservice.com] > Sent: dinsdag 26 november 2013 11:11 > To: luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] extensions: tests > > > On 26 Nov 2013 09:54, "steve donovan" <steve.j.dono...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Justin Cormack > > <jus...@specialbusservice.com> wrote: > > > While we are talking about luarocks changes, I would really like a way > > > to run test suites from luarocks. > > > > This is is indeed a nice-to-have, but requires people to have a > > semi-standard layout (the proverbial 'test.lua' etc). > > I don't think so, specifying one command to run should be sufficient.
Many tests depend upon a test framework, Busted, Lunit, etc. so that quickly becomes more complex than a single command > > > We were discussing about how various other dependencies could be added > > to a future updated rockspec format: > > - 'build-time' dependencies. E.g. someone uses Lake to build a module > > - 'test-time' dependencies. > > Yes build time is a nice to have. that would mean an extra rocktree to prevent the system tree from being 'polluted' by test dependencies Thijs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
