On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Thijs Schreijer <th...@thijsschreijer.nl> wrote: >> I don't think so, specifying one command to run should be sufficient. > > Many tests depend upon a test framework, Busted, Lunit, etc. so that quickly > becomes more complex than a single command >
There might be a dependency to install, but then there is still usually only one command to run? Or do people write tests in odd ways? Your Lua test will just require lunit surely? And the busted tests can just be run by running busted (in the right place). Clearly the test feature would be optional (ie running rocks test package would *fail* if there was no test support). It seems to be not dissimilar to build but with a different outcome. Justin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
