On 15 October 2015 at 17:36, jfbu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > as people reported problems with mathastext under lualatex I have become aware > that \luatexUmathcharnumdef etc... have been removed and \Umathcharnumdef > etc... > must be used instead. > > as I didn't find the info immediately I am asking here: how should I test > (version number, date etc...) > when one should use \luatexUmathcharnumdef and > when on should use \Umathcharnumdef ?
This is a latex rather than luatex issue really, the change was announced in ltnews23 and other places along with the 2015/10/01 release see texdoc ltnews Sorry, I thought we'd pre-warned all authors of packages using \luatex... names, I apologise if we missed you > > or perhaps \Umathcharnumdef was always ok ? yes, it was, the Umath... commands were always available with their basic luatex names and also prefixed luatex. > > I would like to not break people's old installation thus I would be > glad to use \Umathcharnumdef if I am told it works with all earlier lualatex > > best wishes > > Jean-François > > David
