Hi David Le 15 oct. 2015 à 19:18, David Carlisle <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On 15 October 2015 at 17:36, jfbu <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> as people reported problems with mathastext under lualatex I have become >> aware >> that \luatexUmathcharnumdef etc... have been removed and \Umathcharnumdef >> etc... >> must be used instead. >> >> as I didn't find the info immediately I am asking here: how should I test >> (version number, date etc...) >> when one should use \luatexUmathcharnumdef and >> when on should use \Umathcharnumdef ? > > This is a latex rather than luatex issue really, the change was announced > in ltnews23 and other places along with the 2015/10/01 release > see > > texdoc ltnews I must have seen the 2015/10/01 announcement but I was busy on other things, nevertheless I was only half surprised when bug reports (*) started flowing in (*) one, so far no wonder then that I when I started looking for info on the luatex side I found none (also I do not keep for a long time the messages I receive from my subscriptions to mailing lists) > Sorry, I thought we'd pre-warned all authors of packages using \luatex... > names, I apologise if we missed you no problem > >> >> or perhaps \Umathcharnumdef was always ok ? > > yes, it was, the Umath... commands were always available with their > basic luatex names and also prefixed luatex. excellent, and it is my fault then not have to used them from the start thus the fix will be easy and I will be able to push immediately to CTAN a patched mathastext best Jean-François
