On 16 October 2015 at 08:47, Ulrike Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:18:58 +0100 schrieb David Carlisle: > >>> or perhaps \Umathcharnumdef was always ok ? >> >> yes, it was, the Umath... commands were always available with their >> basic luatex names and also prefixed luatex. > > That's not true. In a texlive 2012 > ....
Sigh. Sorry, thanks for the correction. I could have sworn it wasn't that way but I'm happy to believe you! Just goes to show how confusing this prefixing stuff is, will be simpler going forward as latex doesn't prefix things "luatex" and luatex is prefixing less things with "pdf":-) David
