Hi Israel, Yeah, I can see that I might have focused a bit too much on what I perceived as a security problem in lightdm.
I will try gnome-session-manager and see if that is better for my usage than lxsession-logout. Thanks for your replies :) 2014-07-15 14:54 GMT+02:00 Israel <[email protected]>: > Hi Anders, > When you talk about lightdm so much, that is why I thought you meant > lightdm, rather than the lxsession-logout dialog. > That is why I suggested SLiM, as it preforms the same functionality as > LightDM. > > and for the desktop file, I was showing you the part of the file that > contains the editable portion. You could change the bold line to a > diferent executable. > something like gnome-session-quit > though I am not sure if that will work or not. lxsession-manager is > 'gnome-session-manager' > so it might just work... > > > On 07/15/2014 03:46 AM, Anders Bruun Olsen wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > I haven't specifically asked NoMachine about the issue with shutdown > without permission through lightdm, but I suspect that they would (quite > rightly, if you ask me) say that it is an issue in lightdm, not an issue in > NoMachine. I think the problem is that lightdm expects to be the one to > iniate a remote login, if a remote login happens. With NX there is a > different daemon that facilitates the login. Lightdm would then think that > anybody logged in, not through a remotely iniated session through lightdm, > is a local user, that should be allowed to shutdown/reboot. Thinking more > about it, I think I will go and file a bug against lightdm. The developers > can then either dismiss it as a non-issue, or implement a fix :) > > > 2014-07-14 16:28 GMT+02:00 Chris L <[email protected]>: > >> Anders Bruun Olsen <abo@...> <abo@...> writes: >> >> > >> > >> > Hi John, >> > Yeah, since I need users to also be able to login from home, which LTSP >> can't handle, I am committed to NoMachine. I don't want to maintain two >> different solutions. Also, since NoMachine would still be in the mix, the >> issues would still be there. >> > >> > >> > 2014-07-10 18:16 GMT+02:00 John Hupp >> <[email protected]>: >> > On 7/10/2014 10:07 AM, Anders Bruun Olsen wrote: >> > This may be a none-issue for LTSP >> > >> > >> > >> > It is indeed a non-issue for LTSP. But if you are already rather >> committed to NoMachine, then that is not the way to a solution for you. >> > >> >> >> Hi, don't want to butt in but my google search about NoMachine on LXDE >> brought me to this thread. Have you contacted NoMachine to see what they >> say >> about this. Perhaps they can recommend or advise appropriately? >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lubuntu-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users >> > > > > -- > Anders Bruun Olsen > It-ansvarlig > Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab > (Society for Danish Language and Literature) > > > > > -- > Regards > > > -- > Lubuntu-users mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users > > -- Anders Bruun Olsen It-ansvarlig Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab (Society for Danish Language and Literature)
-- Lubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
