I'm for 1.4 move, as I've been using 1.4 for ages! And even 1.5 is now out.
+1 for being forced to support Java 1.2 and 1.3. Otis --- Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Isakson wrote: > > I hadn't heard any discussion about bumping up to Java 1.4 in the > Lucene 1.4 release. Was this just overlooked or are we planning to > drop support for pre 1.4 JVMs? > > There hasn't been any discussion yet, so, by default, we should still > > try to make things work in Java 1.2. > > That said, maybe we should have such a discussion. Folks have been > encountering strange bugs using Lucene in Java 1.3 recently. There > are > some features of Java 1.4 which could be useful, e.g., LinkedHashMap, > > for easy implementation of LRU caches, regex support, logging, xml > parsers, etc. So there are good reasons to move to 1.4. > > Are there reasons not to move to 1.4? 1.4 has been out for two years > > now, and is pretty stable, but perhaps there are reasons some folks > are > still unable to use it. If so, please speak up. > > Doug > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
