Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene to search.apache.org

[Bernhard Messer]

If we have the flexibility to add sub-areas where we can store projects 
not directly using lucene, like part of speech tagger, clustering ..., i 
vote for lucene.apache.org. It is very well branded and all the existing 
ports fit under that umbrella.

Bernhard
I also think that lucene.apache.org would be good joice. All existing 
lucene ports can exist within lucene.apache.org. If we start to add 
other, non directly lucene - related packages, we can

Looks like we should consider alternate names.  Suggestions??
Begin forwarded message:
From: Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: January 14, 2005 1:15:38 PM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jakarta Project Management Committee List 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene to search.apache.org
Reply-To: "Jakarta Project Management Committee List" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--On Friday, January 14, 2005 11:02 AM -0500 Sam Ruby 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The board agenda isn't set yet (I expect Greg to create the initial
agenda over the next few days, and if this isn't included in it, I'll
look to adding it).
Meanwhile, here's a license issue for the proposed new PMC to grapple
with: apparently Josua Bloch is listed as a contributor.  He originally

Here's another issue for the proposed new PMC: search.apache.org is 
already taken by our swish-e instance.  We might find a new subdomain 
for swish-e, but that'd have to be discussed with infrastructure@ 
first.  -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]