Hi Grant, I will open this up for a vote, and then take the result of it to @incubator.apache.org for final approval.
Regards, -- George > -----Original Message----- > From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 8:42 AM > To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Graduation > > Any thoughts on this? I really believe .NET is close (if not > ready) to graduate. It's been in incubation for a long time > now and from what I can tell it meets much of the criteria below. > > On Feb 9, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > > Here are the requirements: > > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduati > > ng+from+the+Incubator > > and are pasted below. > > > > It seems that you don't have to actually release, but you > need to have > > release plans. So, what are your plans for release? Can you > > guys provide status on the other stuff? I'm sure you have the > > Alignment stuff down and I'm guessing all the > Infrastructure stuff is > > done, since I doubt you need GUMP integration. What about > the legal > > stuff? Presumably, y'all have CLAs on file, otherwise you wouldn't > > have an account. Looks like: > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/lucene.net.html > > needs to be updated to reflect that there are now three committers > > and to reflect the other status items. > > > > Being in incubation since 2006 is too long in my book, but it seems > > like you have a decent community here now, and, since you > are going to > > be a subproject, I think the standards are a bit different from TLP > > anyway. > > > > Can we work to get this going? Looks like most of it > should just be > > some bookkeeping at this point. > > > > Thanks, > > Grant > > > > <snip > > > url="http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Gra > > duating+from+the+Incubator > > "> > > > > * Legal > > * > > o All code ASL'ed > > o The code base must contain only ASL or ASL-compatible > > dependencies > > o License grant complete > > o CLAs on file. > > o Check of project name for trademark issues > > > > * Meritocracy / Community > > * > > o Demonstrate an active and diverse development community > > o The project is not highly dependent on any single > > contributor (there are at least 3 legally independent > committers and > > there is no single company or entity that is vital to the > success of > > the project) > > o The above implies that new committers are admitted > > according to ASF practices > > o ASF style voting has been adopted and is > standard practice > > o Demonstrate ability to tolerate and resolve > conflict within > > the community. > > o Release plans are developed and excuted in public by the > > community. > > o > > + (requirement on minimum number of such releases?) > > + Note: incubator projects are not permitted > to issue > > an official Release. Test snapshots (however good the quality) and > > Release plans are OK. > > o Engagement by the incubated community with the other ASF > > communities, particularly infrastructure@ (this reflects my > personal > > bias that projects should pay an nfrastructure "tax"). > > o Incubator PMC has voted for graduation > > o Destination PMC, or ASF Board for a TLP, has voted for > > final acceptance > > > > * Alignment / Synergy > > * > > o Use of other ASF subprojects > > o Develop synergistic relationship with other ASF > subprojects > > > > * Infrastructure > > * > > o SVN module has been created > > o Mailing list(s) have been created > > o Mailing lists are being archived > > o Issue tracker has been created > > o Project website has been created > > o Project ready to comply with ASF mirroring guidelines > > o Project is integrated with GUMP if appropriate > > o Releases are PGP signed by a member of the community > > o Developers tied into ASF PGP web of trust > > > > </snip> > > > > > > On Feb 9, 2009, at 8:02 AM, George Aroush wrote: > > > >> Hi Grant, > >> > >> Has the requirement for graduation been relaxed? Just > from a release > >> perspective, Lucene.Net has been in incubation since April > 2006, and > >> since than we had only one official release, Lucene.Net > 2.0 on April > >> 2007. In addition, the new committers, Doug and DIGY > don't have any > >> release experience yet. > >> > >> Don't get me wrong, I'm all for graduation, but without a > sustained > >> release, I don't think we will be approved. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> -- George > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] > >>> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 8:53 AM > >>> To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>> Subject: Graduation > >>> > >>> Hey Guys, > >>> > >>> Grant over in PMC land here. Seems like you've got a pretty good > >>> base going and have a few committers, what say you to > thinking about > >>> graduation? Can someone take a look into it? > >>> Incubation is not a place to live for a long period of time. > >>> Besides, we want you over in Lucene land full-time! > >>> > >>> Since you are graduating to a sub-project, I believe the > >>> requirements for grad. aren't the same as TLP. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Grant > >>> > >>> > >>> -------------------------- > >>> Grant Ingersoll > >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/ > >>> > >>> Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika) using > >>> Solr/ > >>> Lucene: > >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search > >>> > >> > > > > -------------------------- > > Grant Ingersoll > > http://www.lucidimagination.com/ > > > > Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika) using > > Solr/Lucene: > > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search > > > > -------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > http://www.lucidimagination.com/ > > Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids) > using Solr/Lucene: > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search >
