I don't know if it is ready for a vote (it may be), but I think we should make sure our ducks are in a row, first.

On Mar 4, 2009, at 6:31 AM, George Aroush wrote:

Hi Grant,

I will open this up for a vote, and then take the result of it to
@incubator.apache.org for final approval.

Regards,

-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 8:42 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Graduation

Any thoughts on this?  I really believe .NET is close (if not
ready) to graduate.  It's been in incubation for a long time
now and from what I can tell it meets much of the criteria below.

On Feb 9, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:

Here are the requirements:

http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/ Incubation_Policy.html#Graduati
ng+from+the+Incubator
and are pasted below.

It seems that you don't have to actually release, but you
need to have
release plans.  So, what are your plans for release?  Can you
guys provide status on the other stuff?   I'm sure you have the
Alignment stuff down and I'm guessing all the
Infrastructure stuff is
done, since I doubt you need GUMP integration.  What about
the legal
stuff?  Presumably, y'all have CLAs on file, otherwise you wouldn't
have an account.  Looks like:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/lucene.net.html
needs to be updated to reflect that there are now three committers
and to reflect the other status items.

Being in incubation since 2006 is too long in my book, but it seems
like you have a decent community here now, and, since you
are going to
be a subproject, I think the standards are a bit different from TLP
anyway.

Can we work to get this going?  Looks like most of it
should just be
some bookkeeping at this point.

Thanks,
Grant

<snip

url="http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/ Incubation_Policy.html#Gra
duating+from+the+Incubator
">

  *   Legal
  *
        o All code ASL'ed
        o The code base must contain only ASL or ASL-compatible
dependencies
        o License grant complete
        o CLAs on file.
        o Check of project name for trademark issues

  * Meritocracy / Community
  *
        o Demonstrate an active and diverse development community
        o The project is not highly dependent on any single
contributor (there are at least 3 legally independent
committers and
there is no single company or entity that is vital to the
success of
the project)
        o The above implies that new committers are admitted
according to ASF practices
        o ASF style voting has been adopted and is
standard practice
        o Demonstrate ability to tolerate and resolve
conflict within
the community.
        o Release plans are developed and excuted in public by the
community.
        o
              + (requirement on minimum number of such releases?)
              + Note: incubator projects are not permitted
to issue
an official Release. Test snapshots (however good the quality) and
Release plans are OK.
        o Engagement by the incubated community with the other ASF
communities, particularly infrastructure@ (this reflects my
personal
bias that projects should pay an nfrastructure "tax").
        o Incubator PMC has voted for graduation
        o Destination PMC, or ASF Board for a TLP, has voted for
final acceptance

  * Alignment / Synergy
  *
        o Use of other ASF subprojects
        o Develop synergistic relationship with other ASF
subprojects

  * Infrastructure
  *
        o SVN module has been created
        o Mailing list(s) have been created
        o Mailing lists are being archived
        o Issue tracker has been created
        o Project website has been created
        o Project ready to comply with ASF mirroring guidelines
        o Project is integrated with GUMP if appropriate
        o Releases are PGP signed by a member of the community
        o Developers tied into ASF PGP web of trust

</snip>


On Feb 9, 2009, at 8:02 AM, George Aroush wrote:

Hi Grant,

Has the requirement for graduation been relaxed?  Just
from a release
perspective, Lucene.Net has been in incubation since April
2006, and
since than we had only one official release, Lucene.Net
2.0 on April
2007.  In addition, the new committers, Doug and DIGY
don't have any
release experience yet.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for graduation, but without a
sustained
release, I don't think we will be approved.

Regards,

-- George


-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 8:53 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Graduation

Hey Guys,

Grant over in PMC land here.  Seems like you've got a pretty good
base going and have a few committers, what say you to
thinking about
graduation?  Can someone take a look into it?
Incubation is not a place to live for a long period of time.
Besides, we want you over in Lucene land full-time!

Since you are graduating to a sub-project, I believe the
requirements for grad. aren't the same as TLP.

Thanks,
Grant


--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/

Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika) using
Solr/
Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search



--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/

Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika) using
Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search


--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/

Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids)
using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search



--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/

Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids) using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search

Reply via email to