Why not having a release targeting 2.0, 3.5 and 4.0, then updating the project to 4.0 DIGY
-----Original Message----- From: Sergey Mirvoda [mailto:ser...@mirvoda.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:56 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ Why with 2.0 and not with 4.0 targeting 2.0? On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:54 AM, Wyatt Barnett <wyatt.barn...@gmail.com>wrote: > For folks who badly need to compile it, why not just add a batch file > to build the project. It is one line: > > %windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\msbuild lucene.net.csproj > /t:Clean;Rebuild /p:Configuration=Release > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's a common practice for developers to create a branch to work on a > > new feature, then merge that branch back into trunk later when the > > changes are complete, then delete the branch. > > > > The goal is to ensure that incremental commits, performed now against > > the branch instead of trunk, don't leave trunk in a incompatible, > > unstable or un-buildable state. > > > > Perhaps that's Prescott's intention with the new vs2010 branch? > > > > Thanks, > > Troy > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Sergey Mirvoda <ser...@mirvoda.com> > wrote: > >> +1 for only one trunk upgraded to VS2010 > >> > >> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Lombard, Scott < > slomb...@kingindustries.com > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> I agree with DIGY. > >>> > >>> Although why wait until after the official release? > >>> > >>> Scott > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] > >>> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 3:38 PM > >>> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > >>> Subject: RE: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/ > lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ > >>> > >>> Do we really need a VS2010 branch?. Since there isn't any release since > >>> v2.0 and people have to compile the source by yourselves it has been > good to > >>> support older versions of VS. But after having an offical release, we > could > >>> update the trunk to support VS2010. > >>> > >>> Now for each change in trunk (for v2.9.3, 2.9.4 & 2.9.5) we have to > update > >>> another repository also. > >>> > >>> DIGY > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: pnas...@apache.org [mailto:pnas...@apache.org] > >>> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:11 PM > >>> To: lucene-net-comm...@lucene.apache.org > >>> Subject: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ > >>> > >>> Author: pnasser > >>> Date: Fri Feb 18 20:10:54 2011 > >>> New Revision: 1072121 > >>> > >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072121&view=rev > >>> Log: (empty) > >>> > >>> Added: > >>> incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ > >>> - copied from r1069573, incubator/lucene.net/trunk/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the > >>> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may > >>> contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or > >>> constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient > >>> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or > >>> distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, > >>> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, > >>> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting > >>> it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc. > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> --Regards, Sergey Mirvoda > >> > > > -- --Regards, Sergey Mirvoda
