Good point. Main reason I used that is I could copy it out of the batch file I was using which was meant to be friendly to the VS2005/2.0 project . ..
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sergey Mirvoda <ser...@mirvoda.com> wrote: > 4.0 rules them all. You can release 2.0 3.5 and 4.0 versions with 4.0 > multitargeting > > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Why not having a release targeting 2.0, 3.5 and 4.0, then updating the >> project to 4.0 >> DIGY >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sergey Mirvoda [mailto:ser...@mirvoda.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:56 PM >> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ >> >> Why with 2.0 and not with 4.0 targeting 2.0? >> >> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:54 AM, Wyatt Barnett >> <wyatt.barn...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> > For folks who badly need to compile it, why not just add a batch file >> > to build the project. It is one line: >> > >> > %windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\msbuild lucene.net.csproj >> > /t:Clean;Rebuild /p:Configuration=Release >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > It's a common practice for developers to create a branch to work on a >> > > new feature, then merge that branch back into trunk later when the >> > > changes are complete, then delete the branch. >> > > >> > > The goal is to ensure that incremental commits, performed now against >> > > the branch instead of trunk, don't leave trunk in a incompatible, >> > > unstable or un-buildable state. >> > > >> > > Perhaps that's Prescott's intention with the new vs2010 branch? >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Troy >> > > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Sergey Mirvoda <ser...@mirvoda.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> +1 for only one trunk upgraded to VS2010 >> > >> >> > >> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Lombard, Scott < >> > slomb...@kingindustries.com >> > >>> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> I agree with DIGY. >> > >>> >> > >>> Although why wait until after the official release? >> > >>> >> > >>> Scott >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> -----Original Message----- >> > >>> From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] >> > >>> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 3:38 PM >> > >>> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >> > >>> Subject: RE: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/ >> > lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ >> > >>> >> > >>> Do we really need a VS2010 branch?. Since there isn't any release >> since >> > >>> v2.0 and people have to compile the source by yourselves it has been >> > good to >> > >>> support older versions of VS. But after having an offical release, we >> > could >> > >>> update the trunk to support VS2010. >> > >>> >> > >>> Now for each change in trunk (for v2.9.3, 2.9.4 & 2.9.5) we have to >> > update >> > >>> another repository also. >> > >>> >> > >>> DIGY >> > >>> >> > >>> -----Original Message----- >> > >>> From: pnas...@apache.org [mailto:pnas...@apache.org] >> > >>> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:11 PM >> > >>> To: lucene-net-comm...@lucene.apache.org >> > >>> Subject: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/ >> lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ >> > >>> >> > >>> Author: pnasser >> > >>> Date: Fri Feb 18 20:10:54 2011 >> > >>> New Revision: 1072121 >> > >>> >> > >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072121&view=rev >> > >>> Log: (empty) >> > >>> >> > >>> Added: >> > >>> incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/ >> > >>> - copied from r1069573, incubator/lucene.net/trunk/ >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the >> > >>> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may >> > >>> contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or >> > >>> constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient >> > >>> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or >> > >>> distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, >> > >>> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, >> > >>> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting >> > >>> it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc. >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> --Regards, Sergey Mirvoda >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> --Regards, Sergey Mirvoda >> >> > > > -- > --Regards, Sergey Mirvoda >
