> > Please test them and let me know if you find any problem: > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5037284/Lucene.net-nuget/Lucene.2.9.4.1.zip >
Looks good > > I've seen ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib is always included in the bin folder > after compiling, but if I'm not wrong it's only needed if compressed > indexes are needed: shall I add it as dependency or not? > I would say include it, that way everything works "out of the box". > > I did a few changes: do I create a diff file and send it to someone? > What do you mean changes? I guess you could send them to me, or attach them to a JIRA Thanks Simone for tackling this ~Prescott ---------------------------------------- > Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 00:24:28 +0100 > From: simone.chiare...@gmail.com > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.net nuget > > So, I created the packages using the binary release available on the > official site, but using the XML doc I got for building it on my machine. > > Please test them and let me know if you find any problem: > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5037284/Lucene.net-nuget/Lucene.2.9.4.1.zip > > To test them unzip to file somewhere in your disk, and specify the folder > as path for Nuget in the package management settings window. > > If all is good I'll push them online tomorrow > > > I noticed not all contrib projects have been released as binary, so I'm > including in the contrib pkg only the ones that are part of the binary > release on the apache site. > > I didn't create the sample package with the demo apps because it's just the > compiled apps, and not of a create use for those who want to study it. I'll > look into making a proper demo pkg in the next weeks. > > I've seen ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib is always included in the bin folder > after compiling, but if I'm not wrong it's only needed if compressed > indexes are needed: shall I add it as dependency or not? > > > Finally I needed a logo for the package: > I used that one > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/branding/logo/lucene-net-icon-128x128.png > But if would be great if it was also somewhere in the public site. > For this version I think it's ok to leave it there, but maybe for a next > release it would be good to publish it in the website. > > > I did a few changes: do I create a diff file and send it to someone? > > Simone > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Simone Chiaretta < > simone.chiare...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > maybe I'm missing something, but looks like the snk file for strongly > > signing is in the public repo on svn.apache.org > > > > Simone > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Simone Chiaretta < > > simone.chiare...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Good... no need to have another key... > >> Simo > >> > >> --- > >> Simone Chiaretta > >> @simonech > >> Sent from a tablet > >> > >> On 01/dic/2011, at 21:04, Michael Herndon <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Keep in mind tho that having the token checked in somewhere in the > >> source > >> > repository is not a good idea b/c someone could use it and publish > >> malware > >> > or trojans under your identity. So unless the token is stored outside > >> the > >> > source repository, it's not a good idea to have it in the CI. > >> > > >> > - stored in an ASF private repo. > >> > > >> > the a new key probably needs to be generated and stored in the private > >> ASF > >> > repo as well. > >> > > >> > > >> > The CI build is at builds.apache.org, however its not complete. > >> > > >> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Simone Chiaretta < > >> simone.chiare...@gmail.com > >> >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Mine below > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Michael Herndon < > >> >> mhern...@wickedsoftware.net > >> >>> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Simone Chiaretta < > >> >>> simone.chiare...@gmail.com > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> You mean a different impersonal Nuget account? > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> yes. the goal of the impersonal account was to allow committers to > >> push > >> >>> nuget packages in an automated way without the need of having their > >> own > >> >>> account. there was some preliminary work of building nuget packages > >> using > >> >>> the build scripts. > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> Sorry, I haven't followed a lot lately: at the end, did we end up using > >> >> teamcity on codebetter or another build system? I remember there were > >> >> discussion on that but don't remember how they ended. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> there has been talk on various nuget channels about allowing nuget to > >> >> have > >> >>> --pre tag or having a separate build channel. If you're not familiar > >> with > >> >>> gems/bundler, its basically a way to push packages that are not > >> official > >> >>> releases. (nightly, ctp, beta, etc). So in theory the CI could build > >> >>> packages nightly if the build does not fail into a channels. > >> >>> > >> >>> its also helps from an overall branding perspective. > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> The author that appears on the nuget gallery page can be different > >> from the > >> >> owner that puts the package online. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>>> From what I've seen also used in MS pkgs devs have their in accounts > >> >> but > >> >>>> pkgs have multiple owners. > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> If its possible to do so link your account as an owner & prescott's > >> >> account > >> >>> with the impersonal one. > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> Keep in mind tho that having the token checked in somewhere in the > >> source > >> >> repository is not a good idea b/c someone could use it and publish > >> malware > >> >> or trojans under your identity. So unless the token is stored outside > >> the > >> >> source repository, it's not a good idea to have it in the CI. > >> >> > >> >> One last thing: I notice that the official lib is strongly named... > >> again, > >> >> not a good idea to have the key checked in the source control. I guess > >> now > >> >> someone owns the key for the strong naming and does the signing offline > >> >> from the CI. Is that correct? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>>> But if you want we can also go with the Lucene.net team account. > >> >>>> Simo > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Simone Chiaretta > >> >> Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider > >> >> Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz > >> >> RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber > >> >> twitter: @simonech > >> >> > >> >> Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic > >> >> "Life is short, play hard" > >> >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Simone Chiaretta > > Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider > > Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz > > RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber > > twitter: @simonech > > > > Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic > > "Life is short, play hard" > > > > > > -- > Simone Chiaretta > Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider > Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz > RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber > twitter: @simonech > > Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic > "Life is short, play hard"
