Floyd, Probably sending email to Luke author is more sensible.
from http://www.getopt.org/luke/ Bug reportsHopefully, there will be none! :-) Ok, let's be realistic... if you notice a bug, or if you come up with a useful feature request, or even better - with patches that implement new functionality - please contact the author (Andrzej Bialecki, ab at getopt dot org). Thank you in advance for your comments and contributions! On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Floyd Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I did some test and confirm that Luke-0.8.1 can open my indexfiles built by > Lucene.net-2.3.1. > But I don't know how and where to feedback this to lucene java team or luke > team? > > > > 2008/11/14 Michael Mitiaguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I presume, you were able to open index files with older Luke before > > upgrading. I browsed apache site and didn't notice any breaking changes > to > > index format. Even if were , older indexes still should be readable , as > > the > > changes are usually fully backwards compatible. > > If previous Luke did read your index , you may post to Java group , it > > could > > be a bug. > > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Floyd Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I'd like to know is there any changes in index file format between java > > > lucene 2.3 and 2.4? > > > Because I upgrade java lucene tool, Luke, and could not open the index > > > files > > > which built by lucene.net 2.3.1. > > > The Luke show the message read past EOF. > > > What does it mean? > > > Please help on this. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Floyd > > > > > >
