Thanks and I've email to Luke author and waiting for further feedback.
2008/11/14 Michael Mitiaguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Floyd, > Probably sending email to Luke author is more sensible. > > > from http://www.getopt.org/luke/ > Bug reportsHopefully, there will be none! :-) Ok, let's be realistic... if > you notice a bug, or if you come up with a useful feature request, or even > better - with patches that implement new functionality - please contact the > author (Andrzej Bialecki, ab at getopt dot org). Thank you in advance for > your comments and contributions! > > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Floyd Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > > I did some test and confirm that Luke-0.8.1 can open my indexfiles built > by > > Lucene.net-2.3.1. > > But I don't know how and where to feedback this to lucene java team or > luke > > team? > > > > > > > > 2008/11/14 Michael Mitiaguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I presume, you were able to open index files with older Luke before > > > upgrading. I browsed apache site and didn't notice any breaking > changes > > to > > > index format. Even if were , older indexes still should be readable , > as > > > the > > > changes are usually fully backwards compatible. > > > If previous Luke did read your index , you may post to Java group , it > > > could > > > be a bug. > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Floyd Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > I'd like to know is there any changes in index file format between > java > > > > lucene 2.3 and 2.4? > > > > Because I upgrade java lucene tool, Luke, and could not open the > index > > > > files > > > > which built by lucene.net 2.3.1. > > > > The Luke show the message read past EOF. > > > > What does it mean? > > > > Please help on this. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Floyd > > > > > > > > > >
