Thanks for letting us know. If that project takes off and proves itself, that's great. There would not be a need for Lucene.Net.
It seems to me the project over at codeplex.com is being called "Lucene" -- IANAL, but I don't believe they can do so (or even use "Lucene.Net"). Someone need to check and advice the team. -- George -----Original Message----- From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 4:27 AM To: lucene-net-user Subject: Already some forks of Lucene.Net going on Seems like a few forks of Lucene.Net already started, with the intent to make a full .NET version of Lucene. http://aimee.codeplex.com/ <http://aimee.codeplex.com/>http://lucere.codeplex.com/ <http://lucere.codeplex.com/>This shows that having a real .NET API is something that developers care about. Simone -- Simone Chiaretta Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber twitter: @simonech Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic "Life is short, play hard"
